Could it really have been otherwise? Historiographical implications of the POTENTIA ABSOLUTA and ORDINATA debate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-4124/6522Keywords:
History of ideas, potentia absoluta, potentia ordinata, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham, ContingentiaAbstract
The aim of this paper is to resume the debate about the theological concepts of potentia Dei absoluta and potentia Dei ordinata, not starting from the point of view of necessity, bound to divine action and the established order of the world, but rather from contingency. Thanks to the establishment of the Ockhamist position and the theological revolution of Duns Scotus. Thanks to the establishment of the Ockhamist position and the theological revolution of Duns Scotus, contingency becomes one of the most important topics of the XIV century debates.Downloads
Published
2016-12-20
How to Cite
Fedriga, R. (2016). Could it really have been otherwise? Historiographical implications of the POTENTIA ABSOLUTA and ORDINATA debate. Montesquieu.It, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-4124/6522
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Riccardo Fedriga
Copyrights and publishing rights of all the texts on this Journal belong to the respective authors without restrictions.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License (full legal code).
See also our Open Access Policy.