Could it really have been otherwise? Historiographical implications of the POTENTIA ABSOLUTA and ORDINATA debate

Auteurs-es

  • Riccardo Fedriga University of Bologna

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-4124/6522

Mots-clés :

History of ideas, potentia absoluta, potentia ordinata, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham, Contingentia

Résumé

The aim of this paper is to resume the debate about the theological concepts of potentia Dei absoluta and potentia Dei ordinata, not starting from the point of view of necessity, bound to divine action and the established order of the world, but rather from contingency. Thanks to the establishment of the Ockhamist position and the theological revolution of Duns Scotus. Thanks to the establishment of the Ockhamist position and the theological revolution of Duns Scotus, contingency becomes one of the most important topics of the XIV century debates.

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2016-12-20

Comment citer

Fedriga, R. (2016). Could it really have been otherwise? Historiographical implications of the POTENTIA ABSOLUTA and ORDINATA debate. Montesquieu.It, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-4124/6522

Numéro

Rubrique

Articles