Could it really have been otherwise? Historiographical implications of the POTENTIA ABSOLUTA and ORDINATA debate
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-4124/6522Mots-clés :
History of ideas, potentia absoluta, potentia ordinata, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham, ContingentiaRésumé
The aim of this paper is to resume the debate about the theological concepts of potentia Dei absoluta and potentia Dei ordinata, not starting from the point of view of necessity, bound to divine action and the established order of the world, but rather from contingency. Thanks to the establishment of the Ockhamist position and the theological revolution of Duns Scotus. Thanks to the establishment of the Ockhamist position and the theological revolution of Duns Scotus, contingency becomes one of the most important topics of the XIV century debates.Téléchargements
Publié-e
2016-12-20
Comment citer
Fedriga, R. (2016). Could it really have been otherwise? Historiographical implications of the POTENTIA ABSOLUTA and ORDINATA debate. Montesquieu.It, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-4124/6522
Numéro
Rubrique
Articles
Licence
© Riccardo Fedriga 2016
Le droit d'auteur du contenu des articles publiés par la revue sont la propriété de leurs auteurs ou de leurs ayants droits sans aucune restriction.
Cette revue est publiée sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 3.0 non transposé (licence complète).
Voir aussi notre politique d'accès libre.