Could it really have been otherwise? Historiographical implications of the POTENTIA ABSOLUTA and ORDINATA debate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-4124/6522Parole chiave:
History of ideas, potentia absoluta, potentia ordinata, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham, ContingentiaAbstract
The aim of this paper is to resume the debate about the theological concepts of potentia Dei absoluta and potentia Dei ordinata, not starting from the point of view of necessity, bound to divine action and the established order of the world, but rather from contingency. Thanks to the establishment of the Ockhamist position and the theological revolution of Duns Scotus. Thanks to the establishment of the Ockhamist position and the theological revolution of Duns Scotus, contingency becomes one of the most important topics of the XIV century debates.Downloads
Pubblicato
2016-12-20
Come citare
Fedriga, R. (2016). Could it really have been otherwise? Historiographical implications of the POTENTIA ABSOLUTA and ORDINATA debate. Montesquieu.It, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-4124/6522
Fascicolo
Sezione
Articoli
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2016 Riccardo Fedriga
I diritti d'autore di tutti i testi pubblicati dalla rivista appartengono ai rispettivi autori senza alcuna restrizione.
La rivista è rilasciata sotto una licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 3.0 Unported (licenza completa).
Vedere anche la nostra Open Access Policy.