Could it really have been otherwise? Historiographical implications of the POTENTIA ABSOLUTA and ORDINATA debate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-4124/6522Palabras clave:
History of ideas, potentia absoluta, potentia ordinata, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham, ContingentiaResumen
The aim of this paper is to resume the debate about the theological concepts of potentia Dei absoluta and potentia Dei ordinata, not starting from the point of view of necessity, bound to divine action and the established order of the world, but rather from contingency. Thanks to the establishment of the Ockhamist position and the theological revolution of Duns Scotus. Thanks to the establishment of the Ockhamist position and the theological revolution of Duns Scotus, contingency becomes one of the most important topics of the XIV century debates.Descargas
Publicado
2016-12-20
Cómo citar
Fedriga, R. (2016). Could it really have been otherwise? Historiographical implications of the POTENTIA ABSOLUTA and ORDINATA debate. Montesquieu.It, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-4124/6522
Número
Sección
Artículos
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2016 Riccardo Fedriga
Los derechos de autor de todos los textos de esta publicación pertenecen a los respectivos autores sin restricciones.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 Unported (código legal completo).
Véase también nuestra Open Access Policy.